P0 from docs/async_refactor.md. The mutating routes are sync `def`, so FastAPI
runs them in a threadpool, and they reach Runtime.broadcast through
rebuild_levels — writing asyncio.Queue directly from there. That queue is not
thread-safe: it wakes a consumer by resolving a Future, which only the loop
thread may do. A dropped wakeup means a drawing made in one browser does not
reach another until the next market tick.
broadcast now posts through call_soon_threadsafe when it is off the loop, and
publishes directly when it is on it, so the stream's own path pays nothing.
Worth being straight about the tests: the race is timing-dependent and did not
reproduce in twenty attempts — a foreign-thread put_nowait usually lands in the
ready queue before the loop sleeps, and a tick every second covers the rest.
Even asyncio's debug thread-affinity check stays quiet unless a consumer is
parked on the Future at that instant. So the tests assert the contract rather
than provoke the failure: a broadcast from a worker thread must go through
call_soon_threadsafe, one from the loop must deliver synchronously, and both
must arrive.
Also adds the loop-lag probe, which reports scheduling drift as loop_lag_ms on
/api/status. It found P1 on its first run: 19,441ms worst against 1.5ms in
steady state, which is seeding blocking the loop. "The chart feels laggy" is now
a number.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Duplicate and delete from the line context menu.
- Copies shift ten bars right.
- Default names are up and down; copies become up 2, down 2, etc.
- Exact local data receipt time including seconds.
- Deployment timestamp removed.
- Test cleanup no longer deletes drawings created from your browser.
- JWT password session flow.
Diagnostic mode proved the arithmetic: on a 30m chart every sample snapped to
the correct bar and to exactly that bar's low, while the user still saw the
indicator sitting off the bars. That leaves the half never measured in their
browser — whether the dot is drawn where the price says it should be.
The report now carries the cursor's y, the dot's rendered y, the y the snapped
price maps to, and the y coordinates of the snapped bar's high and low. A
correctly computed answer drawn in the wrong place and a wrong answer drawn
faithfully look identical on a screenshot; these four numbers separate them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Chart geometry bugs live in the browser, and the browser is usually on a
different machine from whoever is debugging it — so "it passes in my headless
run" keeps being said about a chart that is unusable on someone's screen. This
session spent hours on that gap: a screenshot showed the crosshair reading 22:42
while the snap label read 22:58, sixteen bars apart on a 1m chart, and no
headless run reproduced it at any viewport, any device pixel ratio, before or
after a resize, or across ten scripted gestures.
Opening the chart with ?diag=1 makes every snap post what the client computed —
the cursor's time, price and x, the snapped time and price, how many bars are
held, the first and last of them, and the chart width — which the server logs as
SNAPDBG. ?diag=0 turns it off; the setting is remembered. Throttled to about one
report a second, and off by default, so it costs nothing when unused.
Kept as a permanent facility rather than scaffolding to delete: this will not be
the last geometry puzzle, and the endpoint takes whatever fields SnapReport
declares. Documented in AGENTS.md alongside the note about where things run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A comment is a ManualLine with kind="comment", so it inherits persistence, the
shared drawing-number sequence, the list, filtering and deletion rather than
needing a parallel set of endpoints. The rule that must never bend is that
ManualLineStore.levels() excludes them: a comment reaching the level list would
join a confluence cluster and push a phone notification about a piece of text.
It is created with armed=False, and PATCH returns to_dict() rather than
to_level() for a comment, so nothing is ever handed a level-shaped comment.
Three tests cover the exclusion, the shared numbering and the kind derived for
drawings saved before comments existed.
Pinned comments carry anchor_t and anchor_p and travel with the chart; floating
ones carry x and y as fractions of the pane, hold their place through any zoom
and can be dragged. They render as DOM rather than canvas because they hold
arbitrary text, collapse to a numbered dot, and a floating one must ignore the
time scale entirely. A pinned comment scrolled out of view parks on the edge it
left, pointing back toward itself, so it never simply disappears.
Lines & levels becomes Drawings, filtered by type and by text. The text match
covers the label, the kind and the #number, so "comment", "cpi" and "7" all
narrow the list, and Delete acts on whatever the filter shows — which is what
makes deleting by type or by string one button.
Verified in a browser: placing a comment renders it at the click, clicking it
collapses it, scrolling away parks it on the edge, a floating one holds its
pixel position through a 300-bar scroll, and the filters cut 3 rows to 1 by type,
1 by text and 0 for a miss, with no console errors.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two faults, both of which made a finished line disagree with its own preview.
A placed anchor was being discarded by a twitch. finishToolGesture recomputed
`dragged` from the second click's own pointerdown/up, so a few pixels of
movement while pressing was read as a fresh press-drag-release: the anchor from
the first click was thrown away and the line began at the second click instead,
to the right of where it was meant to start. The preview had been rubber-banding
from the real anchor the whole time, which is why the result jumped on commit. A
pending anchor now wins over the current click's drag.
Snapping ignored where you pointed. snapPoint took the nearer of the bar's high
and low but only within 8px, so a cursor between the two snapped to neither and
returned a raw mid-bar price — and the side quietly fell back to the dropdown.
The gate is gone: with snapping on, an anchor always lands on the nearer extreme
of the nearest bar, and that choice *is* the side, a high being resistance and a
low support. app.js already preferred snappedSide over the dropdown, so the
inference was written and simply never fired.
snapPoint also guards against being handed an already-snapped point, which
carries no cursor y and previously compared against NaN.
Verified by driving the gesture in a browser: click, move, then a second click
with 4px of movement while pressed now yields anchor_t equal to the first
click's time and anchor_p exactly equal to the bar's high.
Also lands the groundwork for chart comments, inert until the UI is wired: a
`kind` on ManualLine with `pinned`, `x`, `y` and `collapsed`, a POST /comments
endpoint, GET /drawings, and the chart's DOM comment layer. Comments are stored
with the lines so they share numbering, filtering and deletion, and
ManualLineStore.levels() excludes them — a comment reaching the level list would
join a confluence cluster and push a notification about a piece of text. Tests
cover the exclusion, the derived kind for lines saved before comments existed,
and that numbering is shared.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The trendline bug: a line continued past its second anchor at a different
slope. Two conventions were fighting, and both were wrong.
Lightweight Charts spaces bars evenly however much time separates them — a
weekend is forty-nine hours and one bar wide. The renderer extended the line by
interpolating between bar indices, which looked straight but disagreed with the
server, since price_at() advances per second. Measured on real bars that reached
147 points: the chart drew a level the alerts did not believe in. Making the
renderer match price_at() fixed the disagreement and made the visible kick worse,
because now the line really did climb an hour's worth of slope across a one-bar
maintenance break.
Neither convention is what a person means by drawing a line. A trendline advances
per bar, so both sides now evaluate in bar space: a new bar_space module the
runtime uses to position sloped levels, mirrored by indexAt() in the chart. The
line is straight on screen and the alert fires where it is drawn.
Also, from testing against the live chart:
- A plain click with the trendline tool armed did nothing and left the tool
armed, so the next click began a new line — which is how the slope change was
first noticed. Click-click and press-drag-release are both supported now, with
the rubber band following the cursor between clicks.
- Hand-placed levels are armed, fire once, then disarm themselves, and can be
re-armed from the sidebar. Verified end to end: created armed, tripped within
thirty seconds, disarmed, re-armed.
- Layers is collapsible.
- The 1h moving averages are gone; only the daily set remains.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was no way to say "tell me when ES reaches 7800". The only user-settable
alert was a drawn trendline, placed by clicking two points on a canvas — so you
could not hit an exact price, and making the line flat was fiddly.
A price alert is a manual line with zero slope. Reusing that rather than
building a parallel concept means it inherits JSON persistence, renaming,
recolouring, deletion, clustering, and the rule that a hand-placed level alerts
whatever its confluence score. The only genuinely new code is the input, an
endpoint that takes a price instead of two anchors, and the decision to render
zero-slope manual lines as price lines — which spans the chart and labels the
axis, instead of drawing a stubby two-point segment.
Zero-slope lines also skip drag handles, hit-testing and the "end line here"
menu: a price line has no endpoints to grab. They are managed from the sidebar.
Unlabelled alerts are named by their price, since "1d resistance" does not say
which alert fired.
Verified live: a level typed 25 points above price clusters as resistance at
that price and stays quiet, as it should until price arrives.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
