Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
a395818581 Post cross-thread events through the loop, and measure how late it runs
P0 from docs/async_refactor.md. The mutating routes are sync `def`, so FastAPI
runs them in a threadpool, and they reach Runtime.broadcast through
rebuild_levels — writing asyncio.Queue directly from there. That queue is not
thread-safe: it wakes a consumer by resolving a Future, which only the loop
thread may do. A dropped wakeup means a drawing made in one browser does not
reach another until the next market tick.

broadcast now posts through call_soon_threadsafe when it is off the loop, and
publishes directly when it is on it, so the stream's own path pays nothing.

Worth being straight about the tests: the race is timing-dependent and did not
reproduce in twenty attempts — a foreign-thread put_nowait usually lands in the
ready queue before the loop sleeps, and a tick every second covers the rest.
Even asyncio's debug thread-affinity check stays quiet unless a consumer is
parked on the Future at that instant. So the tests assert the contract rather
than provoke the failure: a broadcast from a worker thread must go through
call_soon_threadsafe, one from the loop must deliver synchronously, and both
must arrive.

Also adds the loop-lag probe, which reports scheduling drift as loop_lag_ms on
/api/status. It found P1 on its first run: 19,441ms worst against 1.5ms in
steady state, which is seeding blocking the loop. "The chart feels laggy" is now
a number.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 15:30:45 -05:00
617d7c75fb Persist alert cooldowns across restarts so deploys stop re-firing every zone 2026-08-11 19:46:11 +00:00
dd9d24b419 Expand regression coverage and document next steps 2026-08-11 03:22:00 -05:00
bb84b6e73f Update higher timeframes from ticks, and count volume-only trades
Two things kept the chart quieter than the feed.

Higher timeframes only moved once a minute. Tick bars are 1m and the socket
filters bar events by the subscriber's timeframe, so on the hourly chart every
tick was discarded and only a closed minute passing through the aggregator
showed up. They cannot simply be fed to the aggregator — it accumulates with
current.v += incoming.v, so the same forming minute re-sent on each tick would
add its volume to every higher timeframe again and again. provisional_higher
combines the aggregator's committed state with the live minute instead, without
mutating it; the next closed minute goes through normally and replaces the
result, because the store keys on the bucket timestamp. A test pins the
behaviour: five ticks in one minute leave the hour's volume at closed plus live,
counted exactly once.

Trades known only by their volume were skipped. Level 1 resends only changed
fields, so some trades carry a trade stamp and a moved TOTAL_VOLUME with neither
LAST_PRICE nor LAST_SIZE. Those now count, with size left at zero rather than
guessed from the volume delta — CHART_FUTURES replaces the minute's volume with
the exchange's own figure moments later, and two ways of counting the same
trades is how double counting starts. Measured: 66 to 74 updates per 90s.

The tick throttle drops to 0.25s, which no longer binds. Measured in regular
hours the gaps between updates are whole multiples of 1.005s — 2.01, 3.02,
4.03 — which is Schwab conflating LEVEL_ONE_FUTURES to one update per second
per symbol. One per second is the source's ceiling, not ours; the longer gaps
are seconds in which their feed carried no trade.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 12:07:52 -05:00
e9c22f6bbd Move alert evaluation server-side so push works without a browser open
Alerts were evaluated inside the WebSocket handler, with a separate AlertEngine
per connection. Three consequences, all of which defeated the point of phone
push:

- No browser connected meant no alert at all. The notification only existed if
  a tab was open to receive it, which is precisely when you least need it.
- Two tabs meant two notifications, since each connection evaluated
  independently.
- Cooldowns lived and died with the connection, so reloading the page cleared
  them and a zone that had just alerted alerted again at once.

The third also meant the calibration in the README described a system nobody was
running: it models a single engine, which is what this now is.

Evaluation moves into Runtime, once per closed 1m bar, over every level. Layer
preferences are deliberately not consulted — they are a display choice made in
one browser, and a push notification should not depend on which checkboxes that
browser has ticked. Sockets now only relay what the runtime produced.

ntfy dispatch is a detached task with its own error handling. It previously ran
inline in the socket loop and called raise_for_status(), where the only except
clause caught disconnects — so a transient ntfy outage dropped the client's
connection.

Delivery verified end to end against ntfy.sh: title, priority and the multi-line
body all arrive as intended. NTFY_TOPIC still has to be set for anything to send.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 00:48:03 -05:00