One file was trying to be two things: a spec written to be executed
top-to-bottom, and a dated record of everything that went wrong on the way. At
1,882 lines it did neither well, and the log was 36% of it — which is why the
plan's opening went unmaintained for days while the log grew every hour.
docs/plan.md keeps the decisions and the reasoning behind them, including the
risk register. docs/implementation.md takes the dated entries: the problems, the
wrong theories, the measurements that settled them. Git already says what
changed; that file says why it was hard, which is the part worth reading before
debugging something similar. Most entries describe something that looked like
one bug and turned out to be another.
Each points at the other, and the four referring files — AGENTS.md, README.md,
NEXT_STEPS.md and async_refactor.md — now point at whichever half they meant.
Git tracked the rename, so history follows plan.md rather than starting over.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
